抄録

　東日本大震災において，自治体が，最優先に取り組むべき「復興計画」を策定したとき，これまで最上位計画として運用してきた「総合計画」との関係をどのように位置付け，復興計画の内容を決定し，調整したのだろうか．このことを考察するため，自治体の復興計画や総合計画，およびその策定関係資料や議会の議事録等から計画内容や策定プロセス等を分析した．この結果，まず，両計画の関係づけは3つの「型」に分類できることを示した．そのうえで，この関係づけや復興計画の守備範囲は総合計画の基本構想および基本計画の策定時 期により影響を受け，多くの場合，復興計画の内容は「復旧・復興」と直接関係の少ない施策が増えることにより，意図せず総合計画に近くなり，両計画の調整が困難になる可能 性を指摘した．

abstract

In the Great East Japan Earthquake, when the municipality formulated a "reconstruction plan" that should be given the highest priority, how to position the relationship with the "comprehensive development plan" that had been operated as the top-level plan and determined the contents of the reconstruction plan, how have they adjusted it?
By analyzing each plan and comparing the both based on the materials related to their development and the formulation process in the minutes of municipal councils, we first showed that the relationship between the two plans can be classified into three “types”. In addition, this relationship and the scope of the reconstruction plan will be affected by the basic concept of the comprehensive development plan and the timing of the development of the basic plan, and in many cases, the content of the reconstruction plan will increase with measures that are not directly related to "restoration / reconstruction." It is also pointed out that this could unintentionally lead to comprehensive plan, making it difficult to coordinate the two plans.